Critique of International Organizations and Human Rights

Has been broken. That's to say it's become a useless

organization whose only purpose is to sustain a

cast of fatally arrogant parasites masquerading as

well-intentioned bureaucrats. I would remind them of what

Mises said, "Good people do not think about

controlling the lives of their

fellow human beings." Those who were supposed to guarantee

collective security and human rights failed in their task.

Instead, they allowed chaos, violence, and international terrorism to

flourish.

The alleged defenders of human rights have sheltered

bloodthirsty dictatorships and regimes that stone women in the

streets. They have systematically voted against

Israel while

remaining silent in the face of Islamic terrorism and the genocide

of Christians in Africa.

And as if that were not enough, an organization established to defend the

territorial sovereignty of its members decided to look the other

way with regard to the situation of the Malvinas Islands, South Georgia Islands,

and South Sandwich Islands, and the surrounding maritime areas.

For us, the Malvinas are a national cause.

I repeat, the Malvinas, for us, are a national

cause. They are also a test of the gulf that can

exist between the words of intent- international institutions and the

reality upon which they purport to act.

Fifty years ago, this very assembly adopted Resolution

thirty-one forty-nine, which calls on parties to refrain from

introducing

unilateral modifications while the dispute remains unresolved.

Fifty years on, the situation has not changed, yet

unilateral modifications continue.