Discussion on Court Evidence Manipulation

During the preliminary hearing,

s- some of the evidence that, uh, was so overwhelming,

uh, as the influencers said after attending

the hearing and,

and, you know, sharing their thoughts on it,

one piece of evidence was the

image that allegedly showed Tyler

Robinson.

Mm-hmm.

But that image was manipulated. The, the

courtroom saw a manipulated image.

So let me show the audience what I'm talking about.

All right, let's go to this graphic.

Um, at the top you're gonna see the

unmanipulated

image of who is supposed to be

Tyler Robinson.

The bottom image is what the court saw during the

preliminary hearing, which is obviously a manipulated image.

I mean, and you can tell it's manipulated based on

the cars that are distorted in

the background.

Mm-hmm.

Now, as we all know, Tyler Robinson is a very skinny guy, okay?

Uh, let's take a look at the next image, side by side of Tyler

Robinson on the left-hand side. On the right-hand side is

the unmanipulated image that was not shown in court.

The manipulated image was shown in court, but this is the unmanipulated image,

which obviously shows a guy who

doesn't look like Tyler Robinson and doesn't have the body type

that Tyler Robinson

has. All we can do is speculate why, right?

But-

Why?

... how is that allowed? How is that okay?

And why is no one talking about this other image?

And this, these are the questions that we have that should be answered.

Uh, definitively they changed the aspect

ratio.

Now, we don't know if the courts did that. Did the sheriff's office do that?

Did the SBI do that? I'm told that the courts cannot do that.

I got some tips from people saying, "We absolutely could not be,

we would not be

allowed to do this. We can't touch anything.

This would have been given to the courts," which would demonstrate that someone,

um, uh, uh, policing, uh, whether it's the SBI or the sheriff's

office or the feder- FBI, if they're the ones, um, that are getting

their hands in this, have decided to change the aspect ratio,

uh, to also degrade the images that we are seeing.

It makes no sense. Once they showed the footage,

the surveillance

footage, um, during the preliminary hearing,

you then go to yourself,

okay, they started grabbing this footage

according to the preliminary hearing at,

by 1:30. They were on the ground. They all had their roles.

Akash Patel, this is a manhunt. Why didn't you release the

footage, the clearer footage which you showed at court-

Mm-hmm

... immediately to help people find Tyler

Robinson

or find Charlie's killer? Why didn't they release more?

They had more.

They had access to more, but they sort of held onto this,

released something

extremely blurry.

Mm-hmm.

And now they're changing the aspect ratio, and simultaneously

they're taking influencers to court to tell us that the evidence is so

overwhelming, but they can't show us one clear image of

Tyler Robinson on

campus. Does, does that make sense? This is your time.

It's a preliminary hearing. You can establish, uh,

you're trying to establish

probable cause to move forward. Drop a clear photo of him and say,

"Here you

go."

Yeah.

"Here's Tyler Robinson." I would've immediately said, "Oh, well, uh, there it

is. There is Tyler Robinson." I can't even

meaningfully

say that. I think there's a Tyler Robinson.

That's a standard white guy with brown hair-

Yeah

... who's wearing a cap.

I-

That's, that's the best I can do.

Yeah. And, um, you know, one of the other-

Could be Tyler Robinson. It could not be Tyler Robinson.

It's cra- this is insane. Hone- honestly, it's crazy. Okay.