Intelligence Chiefs on Election Interference

I never thought I'd see the day

that I had all four major intelligence services agree on something,

particularly about the Chinese Communist Party. Can you walk through what you guys have delivered?

You bet. I think it's such an important moment,

and it's a reminder that those legacy media reporters

that every day live in their ivory tower telling us

that the guardians of truth have actually been a naval blockade against the truth.

If you look at the coverage after the president's historic speech two weeks ago,

and you saw things like there's no non-citizens really voting in elections,

and the New Jersey governor comes out a couple days later,

oh, 6,600 registered, 400 did, and we've known about it for a while.

And they came out and said China didn't interfere in the 2020 election.

And what the chiefs say in this statement today is that the assessments in 2020 may have said that,

but it didn't include the information that we knew at the time

that China had targeted our voter registration data files, meaning 220 million of them is what they acquired through.

Some of them were purchased lawfully.

Some of them were stolen, and some of them were hacked.

What the chiefs say today is the targeting of those files constitutes an act of election interference under the definition.

of the intelligence community.

The intelligence community has very specific definitions,

but targeting voter files is considered an act of election interference.

So the reporters relied on the 2020 analyses, even though the president provided evidence

in his speech two weeks ago, that analysis was hijacked by people who didn't want the truth to come out.

And the intelligence chiefs came out today and said, hey, if this had been put in there, the inference of their statement today is,

if we had acknowledged that we had this data and we knew that China was stealing,

hacking, and buying voter files,

that, in fact, it would have been considered an act of election interference, and it is so now.

That is an amazing knockdown of the media.

And then there's one other piece of it that I think's important

because the media went on right after the speech and said, no big deal.