Discussion on Weather Warfare and National Security

Well, we already saw a similar situation with

Iran.

Uh, the former, uh, president was accusing the United

States of stealing Iran's clouds and rainwater.

And they were under, I think it's about up to 70 years now,

of extreme

drought. Um, there are reports are currently circulating that

because of the war in Iran, Iran was able to

legitimately, uh, shoot down and destroy th- uh, the

United States', uh, radar technology in the area, and

as a result, they have had just actually massive floods

in Iran as

a result of them, uh, shooting down and dis- disabling this

technology. So right there, we see if, if that pans

out, that is true, if the experts prove that there

is a connection, a causal

connection between the radio- uh, the radar technology that the United

States had in the area and then the, the flow of water and

precipitation in Iran, um, then that's a perfect example of, for

example, weather warfare. Without shooting a single bullet, without

sending, deploying a, a single soldier, um,

we can-- we are able to basically manipulate

and control

populations, um, and, and truly, uh, handicap them

and then use that to our advantage.

So it is, i- again, it is a multifaceted,

multilayered problem situation, and we anticipate, we

are prepared, and this is why we would like to bring-- to mount,

I'll just say it

for the record, a multimillion-dollar

fund to attack this because as we start

pulling the, the, the strings of this

international agenda and this international--

these programs that

intersect at the international and national and state levels,

then we need to be prepared to take it to that, you know, take it all

the way through and, and expose what's going on.

We need to be prepared to be suing, um, our government perhaps,

and other governments around the world, um, because this is already ex-

in existence. This is already happening and, um,

we need to be

prepared to mount an offense to the claims that this is a matter

of national security. We've already seen this administration use

glyph- or,

or claim that the use of glyphosate is a matter of national security.

So with the way that the presidency, whether it's a Trump administration, Biden

administration, or previous administrations have done,

the way that they are able

to manipulate and expand, uh, terms and the, the, the

meaning of those terms, it is very foreseeable that this will be

included at some point once we get there that, okay, fine, you were right,

um, on the environmental level, on the Clean Air Act, on the Clean Water

Act, on, on all of these different laws.

It's a matter of national security, ev- as we've seen them do repeatedly.

A matter of national security. Uh, we can't di- disclose any information to

you. It's top secret. It's confidential.

It's secured, so we can't, you know, share that information with you.

And at the end of the day, the federal government has the right to do

whatever it

wants to its citizens, um,

under the guise of threats of national, national security, including

trampling existing very well-settled, strong federal,

uh, constitutional protections.

So we have to be prepared that we're gonna have to take it all the

way to there

because that's probably where it will end up as they tried to do during COVID and

they've tried to do in the past. Um, think of the Pa- Patriot Act and

Patriot Act 2.0. Um, so the-- it's--

we, we are prepared. We are very cognizant of the fact

that we will ultimately, we

will likely probably get there in the end and we need to be prepared,

uh, to take it all the way so that we can, uh, dismantle all of it