Discussion on Chlorine Dioxide Efficacy

the efficacy of a therapeutic. And so the rule goes, the

Corey scale is based on the supposition that the more

attacked a therapeutic is by media,

journals, the agencies, the institutions, the more denigration and

ridicule that a therapy receives, the more

effective it is. And then I came up with, like, points for, like, you know, hit

job in, like, a stupid article in the media, you know,

uh, Fauci

going out on television, someone losing their license, you know,

for

prescribing it. You know, all the kind of things they did against

people using

ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine.

But with chlorine dioxide, it gets pretty up there.

I mean, the history of chlorine dioxide involves

assassinations,

uh, people dying, um, you know, who were involved in it.

And so it's, uh... That gets real dark.

Um, but here's another interesting, um,

really another interesting chapter that I learned about chlorine dioxide.

So I was introduced to a source who was what's called an applied

scientist. Uh, he's now in his 80s.

But during the '80s and '90s, um, he worked with

intelligence. Um, I can't say that he worked for, but he was adjacent.

And one of his specialists- specialties was helping

prominent scientists defect from other countries,

particularly Soviet Union.

And one of the scientists who he helped defect

was a guy named Vladimir Pasechnik.

Now, Pasechnik was the head of the Russian

bioweapons program.

This tells you how deep and how old this goes.

And the s- the source that I talked with had a long experience

with

chlorine dioxide from, like, the '50s and '60s. He'd also done research in it.

But when he met Pasechnik and they developed a relationship,

Pasechnik let him know, this is the '80s, that they had

been doing research with chlorine dioxide. They had been curing TB with it.

That's number one. And he said to my source

that chlorine dioxide is the ultimate antidote to all

bioweapons. This is in the '80s. And so when you

ask, like, why do they pull everything off of Amazon

that gives you a little bit of, you know, context for why they would go

preemptively after something that would, I would guess, out of

everything we used in COVID, would probably be number one in terms of

its efficacy.

Yeah. Whi- which, which, which is crazy too because, you know,

obviously it's like

when you're, when you're dealing with, like, gain-of-function research and all,

all

the different kinds of, like, bioweapon-type stuff that's being

developed.

I mean, you know, who... Like, we all know, okay, COVID,

definitely there's some

shenanigans going on there. But, but who knows how many other things have

been,

have been happening-

Yeah

... that, that we've been exposed to and, and all that, where it's like, okay, we

should probably stock up on this stuff a little bit and, uh, j- just, just,

just to be safe. And, and, and I th- I think, I think as well it's, it's really

interesting because, you know, I can't tell you how many, how many times

it's like things that I know are safe and effective,

whether you're talking about

this or ivermectin or even, like, changes in diet or whatever.

Like, doctors in the medical-