Critique of World Health Organization

The World Health Organization was a criminal racketeering organization

as defined

by the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act.

And by that, I mean interlocking directorates defined

under the Clayton

Act, racketeering and express market

domination and market controls, all of which are defined under the Sherman

Act. This was a violation of the law when it was set up in the 1940s,

and we have to go back to the foundation of what the WHO is and

recognize since 1953, it has been e-

exclusively a vaccine-promoting enterprise

for the benefit of the people who have commercial interest in vaccines.

If you read their opening charter and all of the hearings

that gave rise to their

opening charter from Bretton Woods in July of 1944 to its actually founding

charter in 1950 and '53. What's missing from those conversations

is who is writing the checks. And back then, and you can look,

and it's all in the

matter of public record, Rockefeller Foundation

and Welcome Trust were the check

writers.

Giant surprise. Why were they writing the check for

establishing

the World Health Organization? And if you think it was because we wanted to

have

information sharing and research and scientific collaboration,

then you're actually not reading the actual records from those meetings because

those records were about distribution of drugs.

Those were ways in which we could actually force drugs onto

countries so that they actually had to take dumped drugs that were

dumped out of Germany, the UK, and the US, and they had to

adopt those. So, so you're right. I mean, exactly what you're

saying. In an interconnected world where we have

air travel and sea travel,

and we have all of the flow of people, we absolutely should have

the ability to monitor and surveil the condition of health so

that we have an

awareness that says, "Hey, there's a problem.

Let's intervene." But the problem is that we have to have a

financially disinterested party making those

determinations and making those surveillance observations because the

minute

the people who have a financial incentive to have gain from the decision

to declare a pandemic, the minute they're the ones who

are collecting data, guess

what data they collect? Giant shock.

They're going to collect the data that actually justifies their existence.

As long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be

promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic,

we have no possibility for accountability.

We have no possibility for justice.

And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the eugenics office,

Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that same group of people

that were the same group of people that established the World Health

Organization

in 1953, that same group of people are the ones who are

making this decision. And I don't h- know how you feel about eugenics,

but I have a

problem with it.