Discussion on Charlie's Murder and Free Speech
I want to focus a bit on Charlie's murder.
The fact that he died, not with a gun in his hand,
not a knife in his hand, not a
grenade in his hand, not exercising violence,
but with a means of communication in
his hand. In witnessing that, whether consciously or not,
I think we understand
something fundamental is endangered.
He liked to go to campuses. He would express his point of view,
and then he had him
a microphone, and he'd say, "Come on up and, and argue with me.
Come up and debate with me. Prove me wrong." And that's exactly what
he was doing
the day he died. He was speaking with someone, uh,
more liberally minded, and in
the very act of doing that, he was, uh, he was murdered.
This unnerves us, and it should unnerve us because something
in our Western
civilization is threatened thereby.
Something I love that Charlie Kirk used to say,
he'd be challenged by a kid who
would say, "What are you doing here on campus?
Why are you here?" He would say, "When people stop talking to each other,
bad things happen. When people in a relationship stop
talking,
divorce happens. When a society stops talking,
civil war happens."
Quite right, it, it seems to me, and that stretches right back to Socrates and
provides a foundation for our society.
End of transcript · 231 words