Debate on Earth's Shape and Horizon

BMLSB six nine. His observer foot height

is only one foot. Now that first platform is six point two

miles away, and Platform Habitat is nine point four miles away,

with the horizon far in the distance beyond that.

Now, I'm gonna let you just sit there and take this in, because

this, this is the absolute number

one globe killer.

Modus tollens states, if P then Q, not

Q, therefore not P. If P, we

live on a globe of radius thirty-nine fifty-nine miles,

then Q,

every horizon distance measurement cannot be more

than one point two three miles times the square root of the observer

height in feet.

Not Q, the geometric horizon is

far greater than two point seven three miles for five foot,

therefore not P.

The Earth is not a globe.

But this valid logical conclusion is hand-waved by the globe zealots

as word salad. So I'll put this devastating picture in

simpler

terms. Globe believers must have a physical

leading edge, the geographical edge to their sphere,

in order for boats to go over it

and for land and water to curve around it.

It's a fundamental pillar to their religion.

If the globe they presuppose has a radius of thirty-nine fifty-nine

miles, then the horizon distance is set by the height of the

observer. So what makes this image so devastating

is the

height of the observer at only one foot.

The horizon should be one point two two miles.

But even if we set it at five feet, the horizon should be two

point seven three miles. But we can see the bottom of

Platform Habitat where it meets the water nine point four one miles

away, and the horizon above that beyond in the

distance,

making it fundamentally impossible to see this from one foot

on a globe.

The globe does not exist