Claims About Plasmid DNA and SV40 in Pfizer's mRNA Vaccine

What it means is that this plasmid, contaminating plasmid DNA indeed is getting inside the cells.

And what they're saying this means is that whoever took the mRNA vaccine, there's a-- And if that vaccine was indeed contaminated by the plasmid DNA, most likely such plasmid DNA would also be entering inside our human cells post-vaccination.

Why, why is that really bad? Well, because it's already been known in the past that these SV40 viral promoters are dangerous, and the reason why is because their presence, as it was found in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, would allow such plasmid, if present inside a human cell, to potentially enter nucleus and once inside a nucleus, then

it runs the risk of being able to integrate into the human genome.

So basically such a vaccine could then run the risk of also acting as a unwanted gene therapy. So much so that they als-- they even mention, and this is the first time I've ever seen anyone use that terminology, these authors claim that Pfizer and BioNTech, who are the producers of the, of this vac-- mRNA vaccine,

should be held accountable for exposing humanities to something so dangerous as allowing mRNA shots that had DNA con-- plasmid contamination that had that SV40 promoter because it basically means that the-- some individuals could run the risk then to potentially be producing spike protein for a long-term or permanent purpose if such a

genetic component were to integrate into the human, human genome.

And they also reminded us is that when Pfizer released this information to the regulatory bodies, they never ever informed them that this SV40 enhancer and promoter that is so dangerous was actually present as part of the plasmid sequence. And they said there's no reason why the-- that it should have ever been included.

All you had to do is use a basic bacterial plasmid that would allow the bacteria to produce lots of DNAs that you could then use as a template to produce mRNA, which is what Moderna did. There was no reason to ha-to have that. In fact, they were asking, they were asking rhetorically in this paper, what was the purpose of Pfizer?

What was their intention to have that included when it's that dangerous? So they're mentioning this is definitely, definitely very bad news. This is the first confirmation that we see that indeed thi-this is true, this published science and they-- And of course, the authors once again now, this is numerous

authors that I've, that I've mentioned who called for the fact that use of these mRNA vaccines should be completely suspended until we understand how safe or dangerous they could be in the format that they were used, uh, thus far.