Nuclear Weapons Hoax Claims and the Hiroshima Conspiracy Theory

So with all the nuclear fear-mongering going on again in the news, I thought it would be a good time to remind you or make you aware that nuclear bombs are a hoax.

And I say this as someone with a PhD in nuclear physics, so I'm very well aware of how these things are supposed to work, but I'm also incredibly skeptical of their existence.

So if you've never heard it before, well, it might sound like a crazy conspiracy theory on the Internet, but actually it's very well substantiated.

And once you've looked into it, you will find that it is actually nuclear bombs themselves that are the crazy conspiracy theory because they don't exist, uh, and yet everyone believes in them.

So there's two ways to look at it. You can approach it from a nuclear physics perspective, which is my background, or you can look at it from a military history perspective.

Now, I have kind of come at it from the physics perspective and just through my own investigation, you know, become less and less convinced that the physics actually adds up to anything real.

Uh, I believe it's all just theoretical and that they've never actually split the atom, uh, let alone even proven that the atom exists, uh, to any sufficiently high standard.

So I'm very skeptical of nuclear physics in general.

But when you look at the story, the military history of it, none of it makes sense either.

So there was a guy called Michael Palmer who wrote a book called Hiroshima Revisited, and he did a great job of exposing the problem with the Hiroshima and Nagasaki narrative.

And he put forth the evidence that the bombs were not made from uranium and plutonium, but in fact made from napalm and mustard gas.

So napalm is a sticky, uh, gel-like substance made from petroleum, and mustard gas is a blistering agent.

Okay? So it, you know, causes like blisters and like burns you and poisons your lungs and stuff.

Pretty nasty stuff.

So it was detonated in the air. So they dropped the bomb, detonated it in the air, and then it rains down all this like sticky, poisoning, blistering, uh, fire goo all over the city.

And, um, so it's a horrendous attack. But it wasn't nuclear, okay?

It wasn't a splitting of the uranium atom, you know, based on quantum physics and all this kind of stuff.

Like, no, it wasn't. It was just quite rudimentary, uh, common fuels such as petroleum and, um, and mustard gas.

Now, there was no nuclear fallout, which was a big red flag because I was taught that if a bomb like this was to go off, it would cause thousands of years of inhospitable wasteland, mutations, decay and radiation levels so high that it would be like dangerous to even go there.

But Hiroshima and Nagasaki built right back after the war, and they're both, uh, thriving, modern, beautiful cities.

They're actually in way better shape than most Western cities.

Um, and the scale of the explosion was totally exaggerated.

Uh, Michael Palmer, uh, documented cases of people who were about fifty meters away from the blast and survived.

Fifty meters. So that completely debunks this idea of a, a single bomb like blowing up a whole city and everything for miles and miles around.

Um, then, well, the whole mushroom cloud thing, well, that's not proof of a nuclear bomb either.

Mushroom clouds are a perfectly normal response to a, a large explosion.

Uh, they don't prove the nuclearity of the fuel that's in the bomb. Okay?

So if you see a video of a bomb going off and creating a mushroom cloud, don't assume that that means it's nuclear. Okay?

Um, any, any sufficiently large quantity of explosive would have the same effect.

So what's with all the lies then? Well, I mean, uh, uh, there is two parts to it.

There's basically the strategic deception of, you know, creating a psychological warfare advantage by convincing the enemy that you have the biggest bomb in the world, right?

It just like puts the fear of death in the enemy and, you know, if your enemy is afraid, that creates a, a strong, like, psychological warfare advantage.

But they also had to conceal the fact that they were engaged in an experimental chemical weapons attack on a civilian population, 'cause that's really what happened.

Now, chemical weapons were banned under the Geneva Convention, right?

The rules of warfare state that you're allowed to blow people up with, um, you know, bombs and bullets and explosive fuels, but you're not allowed to burn them with chemicals and poisons.

Now, because that, that's what they were actually doing, they had to rebrand the bomb as a new type of combustion fuel.

And that's what the, the nuclear narrative is.

It's a new type of combustion, not a chemical weapon.

So i-it's this weird kind of technicality, but yeah, they, they had to do that to get around the, the illegality of what they were doing.

Now, there was censorship at the time, the-- after the bombs went off.

The first Western journalists didn't get in till four weeks after the explosion, and when they submitted their report, the military confiscated it because the report didn't support the narrative that they were spinning in the Western media.

Um, yeah, I mean, the media have been complicit in it for a long time.

They've been putting out fake news and documentaries, nuclear scare stories, nuclear scare movies.

Um, there's been a massive, like, scam around nuclear and that word and, uh, uh, and the fear that's put into it.

Um, there was a guy called Galen Windsor who exposed this, uh, the, the scam in nuclear power stations, and, um, he called it a nuclear scare scam.

Uh, that basically none of it was as dangerous as, as we've been told, and I fully agree with this.

I think it's all been hidden on purpose.

You know, 'cause w-wherever there is power, there is secrets and lies.

You gotta remember that, right? Yes, they have power.

Of course, they do. But what they tell us about the nature of that power is a lie, is a deception.

They're not just gonna tell everyone, teach you at school and everything, like, exactly how their most powerful weapons work.

Um, uh, of course not. It's, uh, it's absurd to think that.

So, you know, it shouldn't be surprising that they lie to us about this stuff.

But we can know from the inconsistencies in the official narrative and from the lack of veracity of nuclear physics and quantum physics, we can know that such a thing is just not possible and has never been sufficiently demonstrated to exist.

And the benefit of that is, well, you don't need to be afraid of it anymore.

That's the real benefit of going down this rabbit hole and understanding it, is that you don't need to be afraid of nukes anymore, right?

They have loads of things to scare you with.

Don't worry, they'll think of something else.

But at least this one, you can s- you know, scratch off the list of things that terrify you because they don't exist. It's a hoax.

And those videos you've seen of explosions in the desert, those are not nuclear either.

Those use TNT. In fact, the first nuclear test was called Project Trinity, and this was actually a reference to TNT, which stands for trinitrotoluene.

Trinitrotoluene. So the first part of the word is, uh, trinity.

That's why it's called Project Trinity. So it's just important to realize that in warfare, there is lots of deception and lies, and the actual truth behind the weapons that they use is much more rudimentary.

They just use conventional fuels, conventional explosives, conventional poisons, which are all perfectly sufficient to get the job done.