Income Claims and Black-Market Film Tickets: Questions in a Debate

I’ve checked everything in every way, I’ve taken note of everything.

What I’m saying is, after I speak,

you take it and then give your opinion on it.

You’re not supposed to speak at all,

but if only you get to speak, what is this, sir?

If someone lies blatantly, only then, sir, we say it like that.

Then say that during your time I must have lied.

You said the income was two hundred crore rupees…

Leaving aside an income of two hundred crore rupees, is that how he has come?

Has he shown accounts for two hundred crore rupees?

Has he shown accounts for the years 2005 and 2006?

Has he shown accounts for 2004 and 2005? Then whom have you changed?

Five hundred a year…

If he has left behind an income of five hundred crore rupees and come,

what accounts have you shown?

Second, fine, you say your focus is on eradicating corruption.

I am asking, you have done tax evasion. You know that…

This means you know your film is being sold with black tickets.

Let whoever wants sell those black tickets and go.

You can even lie that you do not get any income from that. Have you ever, even once,

condemned that selling is wrong? Fine. Have you ever, even once, condemned it?

Then that… Then from that, a… a share comes to you. Then what right do you have

to talk about corruption? Now you answer, then say that I will speak next.

No, no… no, let him speak… Then I will finish speaking, then I will finish speaking.

That is… That is,

if the criminal comes and shouts, it will not become true, sir.

That is how they hide their crimes,

by yelling and yelling that this must be done…

Say your opinions when it is your turn, I will answer, sir. We will listen,

we will listen…