Claims About Regional IQ and Societal Development

endlessly, but you look at the blue areas, the Americas, the European, the places Europeans colonized, IQs of 95, 100, and better.

You look at South and Central America, and they go down to average IQs in the 80s.

Middle East, Northern Africa, India, average IQs in the 70s.

Mentally retarded is 75. Sub-Saharan Africa, average IQs in the 60s, even the 50s.

There are non-human mammals with imputed IQs of 50, like dolphins, elephants, pigs.

That, that's the level we're talking about.

And when you go to any of these regions and look at them, Americas, go to Europe, go to Russia, you see a certain kind of society.

Go to Mexico, go to South or Central America, you see a certain kind of society that reflects their average IQ.

Go to North Africa, along the Mediterranean, the Middle East, India, you see a, a certain kind of culture reflecting their IQ.

Go to Sub-Saharan Africa, again, you see a certain type of culture reflecting their IQ.

And we know this intuitively, don't we? Because, for example, in Africa, uh, there were periods in recent African history where white colonizers went there, established Rhodesia, established South Africa, and those white people bring their first world IQ with them,

and they create a first world culture within that third world environment.

So it's not the environment. When Rhodesia's created, it's a first world nation.

When South Africa's created, it's a first world nation.

If it's handed back to the indigenous Africans, the black Africans, it, it reverts to a third world status again.

Rhodesia becomes Zimbabwe. South Africa becomes the, the hell hole it is now.

So it's all driven. The people are the destiny, and the people are the destiny