Watch Download Translate a videoTranslate

Debat tentang Penyangkalan Kamar Gas Auschwitz dan Bahasa yang Menyakitkan

@Uncommonsince76

Translate Original on X

yesterday 2 min Machine translated About Poland History & how-to

English Indonesia

Mengatakan, "Lebih banyak perempuan tewas di kursi belakang mobil Senator Edward Kennedy di Chappaquiddick daripada yang tewas di kamar gas Auschwitz."

Mengapa seorang sejarawan merasa perlu bersikap begitu tak berperasaan dan menyakiti orang-orang yang mungkin punya kerabat yang menderita atau tewas di Auschwitz, dengan memaksakan pandanganmu kepada mereka?

Tapi bagaimana jika pernyataan itu benar?

Kenapa? Pernyataan khusus. Apa, lebih banyak yang tewas di kursi belakang mobil Senator Edward Kennedy—daripada di kamar gas palsu Auschwitz itu.

Yah, kau tahu itu tidak benar. Yang ditunjukkan saat tur— Ya, yang ditunjukkan ke turis dibangun pada 1948.

Kau tahu itu tak benar. Polandia mengakui itu dibangun pada 1948.

Tak seorang pun mau dengar. Mereka bilang itu diperbaiki.

Itu— Tak ada yang bilang bangunan itu pertama kali dibangun.

Itu, itu bangunan yang sepenuhnya palsu.

Mereka membangun cerobong di belakangnya yang tak terhubung ke bangunan utama.

Sebagian besar Auschwitz sudah reruntuhan, kau tahu.

Seperti Disneyland. Disneyland. Itu dulu— Satu-satunya cara agar orang sadar— Itu reruntuhan. Reruntuhan.

Tidak. Ada denah yang masih ada. Mereka punya— Van Pelt juga— Kau tahu. 100.000 mereka— Ada denahnya. Bahkan ahli mereka dibayar 100.000 pound mengakui bahwa yang ditunjukkan ke turis palsu.

Kenapa— Kami tulis satu bab tentang itu…

begitu tidak berperasaan? Kenapa begitu menyakitkan tanpa alasan?

Kau harus kejam karena— Kenapa? Kenapa harus kejam?

—hanya itu cara membuat ini Fakta luar biasa yang menjadi pengetahuan dunia, bahwa yang ditunjukkan ke turis di Auschwitz kebanyakan palsu.

Mereka merusak keutuhan sejarah. Tidak diragukan lagi, puluhan atau bahkan ratusan ribu orang meninggal di Auschwitz karena berbagai sebab, dan— Dan kau sama sekali tidak merasa bersalah— Karena— —memakai bahasa seperti ini— Ya, karena— —dirancang menyakiti dan melukai orang.

Kau harus. Dalam hal ini, kau harus. Kau harus? Siapa lagi? Dalam hal ini, harus. Tak ada yang lain.

Kau merasa harus begitu. Karena di seluruh kompleks Auschwitz telah dipasang penutup kaca seperti keju ini, boleh dibilang, dan tak seorang pun boleh mendekatinya dan membuka penutup keju lalu berkata, "Aku ingin menyelidiki itu," karena mereka menaruh kata Holocaust di atasnya,

dan menjadikannya tindak pidana di banyak negara di dunia bahkan melihat kejadian di Auschwitz.

Dan lihat nasibku saat mulai mempertanyakan Auschwitz.

Itu harusnya membuat curiga.

End of transcript · 361 words · machine translated

Original transcript (English)

To say things like, "More women died on the back seat of Senator Edward Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick than died in the gas chambers at Auschwitz."

Why is it the business of a historian to be so tasteless and so hurtful to people who may have had relatives who suffered or died at Auschwitz, to ram your views down their throat?

But suppose that particular statement is true.

Why? It's a particular statement. What, that more people died on the back seat of Senator Edward Kennedy's car- Than in that fake gas chamber at Auschwitz.

Well, you know, you know it's not. The one they show the tour-- Yes, the one they show the tourists was built in 1948.

You know it's not. The Poles have admitted it was built in 1948.

And nobody, nobody will hear that. They said it was repaired, repaired.

It's, it's- Nobody said it was built for the first time.

It's, it's a totally fake building. They, they built a chimney behind it which isn't even connected to the main building.

A lot of, a lot of Auschwitz was in ruins, as you know.

It's like Disneyland. It's like Disneyland. It was in- The only way you can get people to realize- It was in ruins. It was in ruins.

No. There are plans that exist. They have, they have-- And even Van Pelt- You know that. Their 100,000- There are plans to exist. Even their 100,000 pound expert admits that what they show the tourists is fake.

Why- We wrote a whole chapter about it ... so tasteless? Why so needlessly hurtful?

You have to be tasteless because- Why? Why do you have to be tasteless? -it is the only way to bring this You have to be tasteless because- Why? Why do you have to be tasteless? -it is the only way to bring this extraordinary fact home to the world,

that what they show the tourists in Auschwitz is largely fake.

That they've destroyed the integrity. There's no doubt that tens or even hundreds of thousands of people died at Auschwitz from various causes, and- And you don't have the slightest qualm- Because- -using language like this- Yes, because- -designed to hurt and wound people. You have to. You have to in this case.

You have to? Who else does? One has to in this case. Nobody else does.

You feel you have to. Because over the whole of the Auschwitz complex has been put this, this glass cheese cover, so to speak, and no one's allowed to go near it and lift up the cheese cover and say, "I want to investigate that," because they put this word Holocaust over the top,

and they made it a criminal offense in many countries around the world even to look at what happened in Auschwitz.

And look what happened to me when I started questioning Auschwitz.

And that should make people suspicious.

Up next

Keep watching Swipe through more videos, one after another

iPhone app Translate videos on your iPhone Paste a TikTok, Instagram or X link, add subtitles in your language and save the video to Photos.

Made with TranslateMom

TranslateMom transcribes and translates videos from X, TikTok, YouTube and Instagram. Paste a link and you get a page like this one, in your language.