Muslim Woman and Christian Debate Seeing God in John's Gospel

Watch this really arrogant Muslim woman mock the Christian, and then watch what happens next.

I have a question. Yes, ma'am. You said the first thing about taking a book as a proof for your belief.

You said no internal contradictions. How well do you know this book? I got this from your friend the other day.

It's the Bible, for all of you who don't know.

I don't know which version it is. I don't know who's writing, who decided what to put it in here.

John, we'll read John 1:17, 18, 18. Do you know this one?

I'll read what it says here. It says, "No one has ever seen God, but God is the one and only, who is at the Father's side, has made him known."

Right here it says, "No one has ever seen God."

Okay? Mm-hmm. You believe that? You take that? You wanna read it?

That's your book. This is what you take. You bet.

Right here, same chapter, John 5:19. Right.

Jesus, it says here, "Jesus gave them this answer: I tell you the truth, the Son can do nothing by himself.

He can do only what he sees his father doing.

No one sees, he only does what he sees."

Internal contradiction. Inter- So then this book has internal contradictions.

Can we agree on that? Oh, you don't say yes or no answers.

What do you say about this internal contradiction?

When- One of the basic principles of interpreting any book is you have to read in context.

And obviously when you read John chapter one, the main point is Jesus is God in human form.

He begins- But then- In the begin- But then why- Ma'am, am I allowed to answer you or not?

But you're not making sense. You say the same thing- Oh, well, then, then why are you wasting- ... over and over and over again ... your time standing here talking to me if I'm not making sense?

Because look at all these people here- Yeah, yeah, you gotta say ... who have questions.

Ma'am, why do you waste your time? Why am I gonna let you, why am I gonna let you misguide them with your misguidance? Oh, I see.

Why am I gonna let you, why am I gonna let you misguide them with your misguidance? Oh, I see.

I'd rather sit here and use logic- So you have to sort of be a parasite- ... and understand this ... who comes in here and just feeds off the people who are listening, uh, to me talk?

Ab- absolutely. Why not? Well, that's pretty sad. You've already made a fool of yourself here anyways.

Ma'am, explain this. Yeah. Go. Go ahead.

Okay. Explain this. Thank you. John chapter one, "In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God."

Crystal clearly, nobody has seen God. I haven't seen God.

You haven't seen God. But the claim of John is, and the claim of Jesus is, that he is God revealing himself in human form.

But it's both John. And you'll figure that out.

It's both John. I didn't flip to even a different chapter.

It's two pages away. Both John saying, one saying, "No one sees God," the other one saying, "Jesus sees God."

Is it saying Jesus sees himself as your owners- Jesus is claiming- ... chose to understand ... to be God revealing himself in human form. That's his claim.

And he sees himself. No, you're not God.

Why would John write that? But they have internal contradictions- No, there's no- ... in the same chapter ... contradiction there. We human beings do not see God.

But when God chose to become a human being in Jesus Christ, obviously Jesus knew the Father very, very intimately.

Very, very well. Did she really think Christians don't have an answer to that?

Is she dishonest or stupid? Subscribe for m-